Image: Courtesy of pdpics.com |
In
1904, a Danish philologist, Otto Jesperson (1860-1943) wrote the
following passage:
'There
is one expression that continually comes to mind whenever I think of
the English language and compare it with others; it seems to be
positively and expressly masculine, it is the language of a grown-up
man and has very little childish or feminine about it...'
Ouch! What a cunning slur delivered as though it were a piece of carefully thought-out logic.
What
biological and cultural issues influence gender? What exactly is
gender? The gender feminists would insist that human beings are born
'blank slates' and that the gendering of the human baby has more to
do with cultural bias than nature.
The
well-known words of Simone de Beauvoir are as follows: 'One is not
born but rather becomes a woman.'
Simone de Beauvoir is saying that
there is no innate structure to the brain that defines it as male or
female. Women are not made up of specifically female qualities, and
concepts of femininity are entirely socially constructed rather than
determined biologically.
Steven Pinker on Gender Discrimination
The fact remains that the human being's innate ability to learn suggests that the brain cannot be a blank slate at birth. Culture arises from human desire, and separate cultures arise out of conflicting human desires.
'Our minds are composed of intricate neural circuits for thinking, feeling and learning, rather than blank slates, amorphous blobs or inscrutable ghosts,' says Pinker.
People can be Different but Equal
Difference
does not necessarily call for a superior/inferior binary opposition.
Clearly, people can be different but equal. At first, Simone de
Beauvoir claimed she was not actually a feminist, but a socialist who
believed that women's oppression should end. (Later, she changed her
mind and joined the Women's Liberation Movement.)
Steven
Pinker goes even further, strongly opposing the proposition that
issues of superiority/inferiority are valid reasons for favouring the
behaviour of one group over another. Such differences, in his view,
should never be used to support race and gender prejudice. Pinker's
stance is that to take a specific trait exhibited by a certain group,
gender or race, and then to say this is the only correct behaviour,
is clearly illogical.
Discrimination Leads to Social Darwinism
It
is morally suspect, says Pinker, to discriminate or to punish people
for possessing traits over which they have no control. Such behaviour
leads to social Darwinism and the belief that rich and poor (and men
and women) deserve their status.
Pinker
also refers to the concept of 'Hume's guillotine', which is the
argument that no matter how convincingly you show that something is
true, it never follows logically that it ought
to
be true. A conduct may be successful, but that does
not make it good. It is illogical to prize male language and the
patriarchal literary canon over female language and writing.
'The
point is not that group differences may never be used as a basis for
discrimination. The point is that they do not have to be used that
way, and sometimes we can decide on moral grounds that they must not
be used that way.'
Sources:
Growth
and Structure of the English Language,
Otto Jesperson, University of Chicago Press, 1938.
The
Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir, Trans:
H.M. Parshley, Gallimard, Paris, 1949.
The
Blank Slate
by Steven Pinker, BCA, London, NY. Sidney, Toronto, 2002.
No comments:
Post a Comment